Author |
Message |
Cameron
Title: :O � O:
Joined: Feb 01 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4637
|
http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/728706/scientists-prove-dna-lasts-521-years-jurassic-park-will-never-exist/ wrote: |
Horrible scientists and dinosaur fossils from New Zealand are going to ruin your day; the (mad) scientists have discovered that DNA has a half-life of 521 years. This means Jurassic Park can never happen in real life, and that means enraged, cloned Velocipedes will never terrorize Jeff Goldblum in real life.
Palaeogeneticists led by Morten Allentoft at the University of Copenhagen and Michael Bunce at Murdoch University in Perth Australia, discovered the terrible news after examining 158 DNA-containing leg bones of three species of extinct giant birds called moa, you know, like the kind in Guild Wars 2. |
Sadness. This also means that if we don't get into human cloning within the next 500 years, then we won't get to populate the earth with a multitude of Tony Danzas. Life as I know it no longer has meaning.
|
|
|
  |
|
DarknessDeku
Title: Deku Scrub
Joined: Dec 08 2007
Location: The Forest
Posts: 3285
|
I'm thankful for this. It's stupid to recreate something big and dangerous as fucking dinosaurs.
|

i'll_bite_your_ear wrote: |
DarknessDeku is already assimilated by the bots.
He knows your algorithm. |
|
|
  |
|
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
Posts: 7565
|
That's all fine and dandy, except that Jurassic Park didn't get DNA from dinosaur bones (the book did go into the possibility, but it was written off as being far, far too inefficient). They got it from blood preserved in a mosquito preserved in amber. It's possible DNA could last longer in that state.
On top of that, they never were working with the entire DNA molecule in the first place, as they were using computers to sort out a whole bunch of fragments, and even then they had to just guess and splice in something similar to get their "Dino DNA". The book makes this clearer, as naturally the movie focused mostly on OMG T-REX and less on the techno-babble specifics...the chief scientist even makes it clear they haven't created "real" dinosaurs, just a reasonable facsimile based upon their best guess.
The real reason Jurassic Park will never exist - there will never be a human being as stupid as John Hammond to make it exist.
|
|
|
  |
|
sidewaydriver
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Title: ( ͡� 
Joined: May 11 2008
Posts: 6160
|
Bah, I can't take any scientist seriously that says something is impossible. That's their cue to retire.
|
 Shake it, Quake it, Space Kaboom. |
|
  |
|
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3112
|
sidewaydriver wrote: |
Bah, I can't take any scientist seriously that says something is impossible. That's their cue to retire. |
Exactly. I would never let a scientist like that work on my program to make cloned Teddy Roosevelts and Velociraptors fight to the death in my coliseum.
|
 So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind. |
|
  |
|
Drew Linky
Wizard
Joined: Jun 12 2009
Posts: 4209
|
Greg the White wrote: |
sidewaydriver wrote: |
Bah, I can't take any scientist seriously that says something is impossible. That's their cue to retire. |
Exactly. I would never let a scientist like that work on my program to make cloned Teddy Roosevelts and Velociraptors fight to the death in my coliseum. |
I'll get to work on it.
|
https://discord.gg/homestuck is where you can find me literally 99% of the time. Stop on by if you feel like it, we're a nice crowd. |
|
   |
|
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
Posts: 2515
|
Quote: |
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, a major review of fertility legislation, repealed the 2001 Cloning Act by making amendments of similar effect to the 1990 Act. The 2008 Act also allows experiments on hybrid human-animal embryos. |
I can't wait for my human-animal hybrids.
Also they could probably clone humans now but there's just the "laws" and "ethics" of the situation. If the situation ever became on earth were there was a serious food shortage i would not object to cloning of animals. Hell i don't see the problem with cloning animals now. However i wouldn't release them into the wild as that would fuck up ecosystems. I guess it wouldn't really matter too much anyway, there isn't much nature left on earth, though it would be best to avoid that eventuality.
|
|
|
  |
|
UsaSatsui
Title: The White Rabbit
Joined: May 25 2008
Location: Hiding
Posts: 7565
|
Alowishus wrote: |
Also they could probably clone humans now but there's just the "laws" and "ethics" of the situation. If the situation ever became on earth were there was a serious food shortage i would not object to cloning of animals. Hell i don't see the problem with cloning animals now. However i wouldn't release them into the wild as that would fuck up ecosystems. I guess it wouldn't really matter too much anyway, there isn't much nature left on earth, though it would be best to avoid that eventuality. |
Human cloning is probably not too far off, but I don't think it could be done now. And remember, right now, cloning is very hit or miss. The one success takes hundreds or thousands of horrific failures, and the clones don't always have normal lifespans or livelihoods.
|
|
|
  |
|
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
Posts: 2515
|
UsaSatsui wrote: |
Alowishus wrote: |
Also they could probably clone humans now but there's just the "laws" and "ethics" of the situation. If the situation ever became on earth were there was a serious food shortage i would not object to cloning of animals. Hell i don't see the problem with cloning animals now. However i wouldn't release them into the wild as that would fuck up ecosystems. I guess it wouldn't really matter too much anyway, there isn't much nature left on earth, though it would be best to avoid that eventuality. |
Human cloning is probably not too far off, but I don't think it could be done now. And remember, right now, cloning is very hit or miss. The one success takes hundreds or thousands of horrific failures, and the clones don't always have normal lifespans or livelihoods. |
Very true.
|
|
|
  |
|
LeshLush
Joined: Oct 19 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1479
|
Alowishus wrote: |
Quote: |
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, a major review of fertility legislation, repealed the 2001 Cloning Act by making amendments of similar effect to the 1990 Act. The 2008 Act also allows experiments on hybrid human-animal embryos. |
I can't wait for my human-animal hybrids.
Also they could probably clone humans now but there's just the "laws" and "ethics" of the situation. If the situation ever became on earth were there was a serious food shortage i would not object to cloning of animals. Hell i don't see the problem with cloning animals now. However i wouldn't release them into the wild as that would fuck up ecosystems. I guess it wouldn't really matter too much anyway, there isn't much nature left on earth, though it would be best to avoid that eventuality. |
Cloning animals would actually be detrimental to a food shortage. Animals raised for slaughter eat more food over the course of their life than they provide. I'm all about eating meat, because it's delicious, but as the world's population continues to increase we'll probably have to enact laws limiting meat consumption. Vegetarianism, and veganism in particular, is really good for the planet. Not to mention your colon.
That being said, I'm cooking steak tonight.
|
|
|
  |
|
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
Posts: 2515
|
LeshLush wrote: |
Cloning animals would actually be detrimental to a food shortage. Animals raised for slaughter eat more food over the course of their life than they provide. I'm all about eating meat, because it's delicious, but as the world's population continues to increase we'll probably have to enact laws limiting meat consumption. Vegetarianism, and veganism in particular, is really good for the planet. Not to mention your colon.
That being said, I'm cooking steak tonight. |
Yeah, i just love mah meat. I actually wasn't thinking of overpopulation i was thinking more in terms of food shortage for existing population. Talking in extremes of population. The highest projections by the UN are 25 billion by 2100. The lowest is 7 billion after an increase and recession. What it will probably be is about 10-15billion by 2100.
It's difficult to say the implications that this will have. Arguably vegetarianism is just as bad. Indeed you need to feed animals and animals need space to graze unless you carry out battery farming. The production of crops also requires a large amount of space.
If population was to reach 25billion then there would be less graze-able/cultivatable land. If it was anything like the urbanisation during the industrial revolution then cities would enlarge increasing this.
It would also depend on the economic situation which i can't particularly comment on as i can't predict the future but if there was a large population increase and lack of jobs then movement to the city would be likely.
Then again it depends on other things such as city planning. The Le Corbusier model of "utopia" may be needed. A lot of system built housing were everyone is sufficient within their own block. Not a particularly nice way to live but it's viable.
Space is important and the reduction of sprawl would be needed to allow space.
Also with crops what if GM crops were depended on? GM crops are extremely susceptible to disease. So whole populations could be fucked if a crop fails.
I think that both have their pros and cons. Indeed a healthier lifestyle is lead through vegetables as well.
Went off kind of on a tangent there.
EDIT: Overall overpopulation isn't something which is easy to deal with. It's worrying for me. As someone who will soon graduate with a degree in Urban Planning it's kind of scary to think that in the future i will have to make decisions regarding city/regional/national designs for overpopulation. Indeed it's not something they teach you how to deal with either in your studies apart from think outside the box and use lateral thinking which unfortunately currently in political systems there isn't a lot of scope for.
I'd be more worried about water than food to be honest, especially with climate change.
|
|
|
  |
|
sidewaydriver
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Title: ( ͡� 
Joined: May 11 2008
Posts: 6160
|
LeshLush wrote: |
Alowishus wrote: |
Quote: |
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, a major review of fertility legislation, repealed the 2001 Cloning Act by making amendments of similar effect to the 1990 Act. The 2008 Act also allows experiments on hybrid human-animal embryos. |
I can't wait for my human-animal hybrids.
Also they could probably clone humans now but there's just the "laws" and "ethics" of the situation. If the situation ever became on earth were there was a serious food shortage i would not object to cloning of animals. Hell i don't see the problem with cloning animals now. However i wouldn't release them into the wild as that would fuck up ecosystems. I guess it wouldn't really matter too much anyway, there isn't much nature left on earth, though it would be best to avoid that eventuality. |
Cloning animals would actually be detrimental to a food shortage. Animals raised for slaughter eat more food over the course of their life than they provide. I'm all about eating meat, because it's delicious, but as the world's population continues to increase we'll probably have to enact laws limiting meat consumption. Vegetarianism, and veganism in particular, is really good for the planet. Not to mention your colon.
That being said, I'm cooking steak tonight. |
Yeah, tofu steak. Go hug a tree, hippie.
|
 Shake it, Quake it, Space Kaboom. |
|
  |
|
Cactus
Joined: Oct 05 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 104
|
There's still DNA in bones that are thousands of years old? I though the organic stuff decomposed fairly quickly.
|
|
|
  |
|
LeshLush
Joined: Oct 19 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1479
|
Cactus wrote: |
There's still DNA in bones that are thousands of years old? I though the organic stuff decomposed fairly quickly. |
Someone didn't read.
|
|
|
  |
|
Cactus
Joined: Oct 05 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 104
|
LeshLush wrote: |
Cactus wrote: |
There's still DNA in bones that are thousands of years old? I though the organic stuff decomposed fairly quickly. |
Someone didn't read. |
I'm pretty sure I read it.
This story has nothing to do with dinosaurs anyway. I'm sure someone has checked whether dinosaur bones contain DNA or not at some point before this.
|
|
|
  |
|
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 3332
|
Sounds like we need to colonize Mars before we hit 25 billion people on earth!
|
|
|
  |
|
Drew Linky
Wizard
Joined: Jun 12 2009
Posts: 4209
|
Genetics can be used for more than cloning. There's tons of work being done on plants and their yield, for instance. I'm planning on being a molecular biologist or genetic research scientist, and if I get to do the things I dream of I will be working directly with plant or animal DNA. It may come to the point where we require genetically altered crops that create a lot more organic matter than the stuff we have today, to feed ourselves and/or livestock. If I play my cards right I may be able to become a scientist that actually works with such things.
You're all welcome. <3
|
https://discord.gg/homestuck is where you can find me literally 99% of the time. Stop on by if you feel like it, we're a nice crowd. |
|
   |
|
sidewaydriver
2010 SLF Tag Champ
Title: ( ͡� 
Joined: May 11 2008
Posts: 6160
|
Drew Linky wrote: |
You're all welcome. <3 |
|
 Shake it, Quake it, Space Kaboom. |
|
  |
|
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
Posts: 6544
|
Drew Linky wrote: |
You're all welcome. <3 |
But you didn't tell us anything we didn't already know.
|
|
|
   |
|
Cameron
Title: :O � O:
Joined: Feb 01 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4637
|
Drew Linky wrote: |
Genetics can be used for more than cloning. There's tons of work being done on plants and their yield, for instance. I'm planning on being a molecular biologist or genetic research scientist, and if I get to do the things I dream of I will be working directly with plant or animal DNA. It may come to the point where we require genetically altered crops that create a lot more organic matter than the stuff we have today, to feed ourselves and/or livestock. If I play my cards right I may be able to become a scientist that actually works with such things.
You're all welcome. <3 |
We already knew all this.
|
|
|
  |
|
i'll_bite_your_ear
Title: Distillatoria
Joined: Jun 09 2010
Location: van down by the river
Posts: 3707
|
Somehow comforting because it eliminates the possibility of me getting ripped apart by a pack of hungry velociraptors. On the other hand, a real life jurassic park would be kinda interesting to.
|
 it was the best of times
it was the blurst of times |
|
  |
|
Ky-Guy
Title: Obscure Nintendo Gamer
Joined: Jul 19 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1418
|
Don't give up hope, guys. Maybe one day, we can learn to make anything we want from scratch using DNA building technology.
|

Syd Lexia wrote: |
iPhone games are what you play when you can't get at actual games. You know, like how sometimes alcoholics drink mouthwash. |
Lexiabot9000 wrote: |
Your love life will be happy and harmonious if you stick to masturbating. |
|
|
      |
|
LeshLush
Joined: Oct 19 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1479
|
Ky-Guy wrote: |
Don't give up hope, guys. Maybe one day, we can learn to make anything we want from scratch using DNA building technology. |
Or the DNA of a frog.
|
|
|
  |
|
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
Posts: 6544
|
|
   |
|
i'll_bite_your_ear
Title: Distillatoria
Joined: Jun 09 2010
Location: van down by the river
Posts: 3707
|
Ky-Guy wrote: |
Don't give up hope, guys. Maybe one day, we can learn to make anything we want from scratch using DNA building technology. |
Things that really mean something are not made out of DNA, Ky-Guy.
Well... nearly everything is made partially out of DNA but you get my point.
|
 it was the best of times
it was the blurst of times |
|
  |
|
|