Right, i've cooled off considerably and i want to just explain briefly how this has flown.

I firstly want to apologise especially to Sydlexia. If it hasn't been noticed at all by some it should be noticed now that i am very argumentative. His post (up there) was actually quite nice despite the asshole i was to him.

I understand that his post wasn't what he intended to be taken from it. From my point of view at this stage i didn't view anything being said by anyone as being mean and that his post was literally just an attack at me out of nowhere.

I will state that the material in my posts may have been interpreted in the wrong way. I spoke to my consul on all these issues Woodzy and the questions he asked me about my posts and his interpretation of them where not what i meant in some cases.

I will admit i was pretty harsh and i am honestly surprised i wasn't banned for it. The rule on this actually wasn't what i thought it was - i remembered the rule but not the explanation of it - aka not a pulpit and nothing else.

If i had that in mind i wouldn't have written what i did. However irrespective of the shit that went down the material in my posts as i interpret it i still believe and i do mean how i interpret it.

Woodzy stated that i was mean spirited. This is difficult to explain but my points i do agree were very critical and that offence may be taken from that (and i agree now that i shouldn't have even stated most of them) but i was not intentionally trying to be mean. I was trying to just explain my opinion and at no point was i mad or anything before i reacted to Sydlexias post.

With the nature of the things i was saying i can understand how people could think i was being mean but i was really just saying what i believe and if it conflicts with what you believe then i apologise for that as well. I did not want this to result in how it did.

As well as being an argumentative person i am also a person who finds it difficult to apologise for things so when i do say it i do mean it.

So i do apologise that offence was taken but my views are still my views and with the nature of this forum and the rules it's not really the place to put forward the views that i have on this matter.

Indeed discussion of this matter via text is also not particularly a good way to express my points. It's difficult to clarify things via text and then things can be interpreted differently than intended. I would say if i was speaking in person with all of you that this would have been a completely different conversation.