SydLexia.com Forum Index
"Stay awhile. Stay... FOREVER!"

  [Edit Profile]  [Search]  [Memberlist]  [Usergroups]  [FAQ]  [Register]
[Who's Online]  [Log in to check your private messages]  [Log in]
Democrats make move to support gay community


Reply to topic
Author Message
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 04:19 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
Well, you actually can pick and choose what you like from the Old Testament.

Christ was a reformist, and his message that the days of God as an angry fearmonger were over. If you can find anything in New Testament attributed to Christ that in any way seems to contradict anything in the Old Testament, the Old Testament text can summarily ignored.

Jesus never mentions homosexuals, so the verses in the Old Testament stand.

All you Christians who don't think gays should die aren't really following the Bible.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 04:20 pm Reply with quote Back to top

But did Jesus explicitly affirm the law that gays are to be slain for He is the LORD? Jesus did say "Love your neighbor," and if all of your neighbors are male, you don't have much choice.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 04:21 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The-Excel wrote:
But did Jesus affirm the law that gays are to be slain for HE is the Lord?

He doesn't have to affirm it, according to Syd. If he were to negate it, that's one thing. Jesus never reforms the scriptures about homosexuality, since he never talked about them.

For the record, I'm a Jesus fan. I love his philosophy about humanity. I wish more people, including Christians, followed it.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 04:23 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Then better still kill them all just to be safe.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 05:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

No, Excel makes a great point. Jesus said "Love thy neighbor". That can be interpreted in a number of ways, and one of those ways is "don't kill homosexuals".

And that would contradict and thereby supercede the Old Testament.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 05:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The general consensus within this thread seems to indicate that christians seem to pick and choose what they believe in.

I agree it's totally true and of course large parts do contradict eachother which doesn't really help its cause - albeit not surprising considering many of the books were written decades/centuries apart. But if that is the case why is the persecution of gay people still so high in their agenda and not prohibiting tattoos like Cattivo said or slavery any of the other things they have ignored.

They really do seem to pick and choose their agenda and i can see someone raising the slavery point or think my point with it is stupid - "well they can't do that anymore, they can't say slavery is good because it's enshrined in law that you cannot have slaves"

However that is identical to the homosexuality point and it can be pointed at from the same angle.

If gay marriage was legal then they couldn't harp on about persecuting homosexuals just as they can't promote slavery because it's illegal. I imagine there would be a period of acceptance that would have to build to it but it's really the same sort of thing. Persecution of homosexuals could just as easily be ignored just as permitting slavery has been.

Just a thought.
View user's profileSend private message
Greg the White
Joined: Apr 09 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 05:16 pm Reply with quote Back to top

It's just easier to hate is all.

It's easier to paint some angry, self-affirming sign, and stand outside to fight your moral crusade than to organize free meals for the poor.


So here's to you Mrs. Robinson. People love you more- oh, nevermind.
 
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 05:26 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Greg the White wrote:
It's just easier to hate is all.

It's easier to paint some angry, self-affirming sign, and stand outside to fight your moral crusade than to organize free meals for the poor.

Yeah i guess and it's sad really because they often try to paint the view that they are kind and loving people when they are basically just a hate machine and a group of (mostly) bigots.
View user's profileSend private message
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 06:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
No, Excel makes a great point. Jesus said "Love thy neighbor". That can be interpreted in a number of ways, and one of those ways is "don't kill homosexuals".

And that would contradict and thereby supercede the Old Testament.

In Matthew 19:21 he also said you should sell all your possessions and give to the poor, but I don't see too many people doing that. Quite the opposite, in fact. It's usually "fuck the poor, I earned that money." I'm guessing Jesus would be okay with welfare programs, unlike many "Christians".

In Matthew 25:40 Jesus says that whatever you do to the least of his brothers, you do to him. Again, not followed by many Christians who are going out of their way to make life harder for people who they disagree with or deem as sinners.

My point, people pick and choose from the New Testament, as well. It's not like they only ignore parts of the Old Testament because Jesus reformed the teachings. People cite the parts of the Bible that conform to their personal beliefs, and ignore the parts (even if they're in the New Testament) that don't jive with their own values.


Pretty much the greatest thread of all time: http://www.sydlexia.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14789

Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 07:02 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Greg the White wrote:
It's just easier to hate is all.

It's easier to paint some angry, self-affirming sign, and stand outside to fight your moral crusade than to organize free meals for the poor.

It's actually harder to hate because you need to be specific about it to have impact. "I love gay people" carries less weight because no one will ask why you do. When you say "I hate gay people," then people get defensive and ask what you have against them.

ALSO: http://www.theonion.com/articles/god-angrily-clarifies-dont-kill-rule,222/
Quote:
"To be honest, there's some contradictory stuff in there, okay?" God said. "So I can see how it could be pretty misleading. I admit it—My bad. I did My best to inspire them, but a lot of imperfect human agents have misinterpreted My message over the millennia. Frankly, much of the material that got in there is dogmatic, doctrinal bullshit. I turn My head for a second and, suddenly, all this stuff about homosexuality gets into Leviticus, and everybody thinks it's God's will to kill gays. It absolutely drives Me up the wall."


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 07:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The-Excel wrote:
Greg the White wrote:
It's just easier to hate is all.

It's easier to paint some angry, self-affirming sign, and stand outside to fight your moral crusade than to organize free meals for the poor.

It's actually harder to hate because you need to be specific about it to have impact. "I love gay people" carries less weight because no one will ask why you do. When you say "I hate gay people," then people get defensive and ask what you have against them.

ALSO: http://www.theonion.com/articles/god-angrily-clarifies-dont-kill-rule,222/
Quote:
"To be honest, there's some contradictory stuff in there, okay?" God said. "So I can see how it could be pretty misleading. I admit it—My bad. I did My best to inspire them, but a lot of imperfect human agents have misinterpreted My message over the millennia. Frankly, much of the material that got in there is dogmatic, doctrinal bullshit. I turn My head for a second and, suddenly, all this stuff about homosexuality gets into Leviticus, and everybody thinks it's God's will to kill gays. It absolutely drives Me up the wall."

Lol The Onion.
View user's profileSend private message
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 07:10 pm Reply with quote Back to top

It's pretty profound sometimes.

It does have a point -- the Bible isn't perfect. Bits and pieces of it have been lost over time and the translations and occluded texts and everything else make some question most peoples' claims of its absolute authoritativeness.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Vert1
Joined: Aug 28 2011
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 08:57 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Food for thought:

Quote:
Whoever says a "giant fuck you to bigots" is a bigot, and in fact a total bigot, a kind of uberbigot, because he basically hates EVERYONE, not just simply this or that particular group of people -- including HIMSELF. Because what the little subhuman means by "bigot" here is simply someone who is not enough of a hypocrite to deny using conceptual categories to make value judgements, and since it is impossible to make value judgements without using conceptual categories (the "bigot", for example, is such a category), and since moreover it is impossible to live WITHOUT making value judgements, the anti-"bigot" is also including himself in the definition of "bigot". So not only he hates others, indeed everyone, he also hates himself, in addition to being a hypocrite AND an idiot (for not being capable of understanding a word I just said).


Image
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
The Opponent
Title: Forum Battle WINNER
Joined: Feb 24 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
PostPosted: Aug 01 2012 10:46 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I didn't understand a word of that.


I'm not a bad enough dude, but I am an edgy little shit. I'll do what I can.
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Drew Linky
Wizard
Joined: Jun 12 2009
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 12:40 am Reply with quote Back to top

I'm not sure if this will add anything useful to the conversation, but this all makes me think of this:

Quote:
Think of it like a movie. The Torah is the first one, and the New Testament is the sequel. Then the Quran comes out, and it retcons the last one like it never happened. There's still Jesus, but he's not the main character anymore, and the messiah hasn't shown up yet.

Jews like the first movie but ignored the sequels, Christians think you need to watch the first two, but the third movie doesn't count, Moslems think the third one was the best, and Mormons like the second one so much they started writing fan fiction that doesn't fit with ANY of the series canon. So much their version deals with Israelite "native" Americans, and aliens from the planet Kolob. Think of it as the bible goes the way of "My Immortal".

Just made me laugh is all.


https://discord.gg/homestuck is where you can find me literally 99% of the time. Stop on by if you feel like it, we're a nice crowd.
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Cameron
Title: :O � O:
Joined: Feb 01 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 01:46 am Reply with quote Back to top

Vert1 wrote:
Food for thought:

Quote:
Whoever says a "giant fuck you to bigots" is a bigot, and in fact a total bigot, a kind of uberbigot, because he basically hates EVERYONE, not just simply this or that particular group of people -- including HIMSELF. Because what the little subhuman means by "bigot" here is simply someone who is not enough of a hypocrite to deny using conceptual categories to make value judgements, and since it is impossible to make value judgements without using conceptual categories (the "bigot", for example, is such a category), and since moreover it is impossible to live WITHOUT making value judgements, the anti-"bigot" is also including himself in the definition of "bigot". So not only he hates others, indeed everyone, he also hates himself, in addition to being a hypocrite AND an idiot (for not being capable of understanding a word I just said).

Just because "everyone is prejudiced against something" doesn't make that prejudice excusable or okay.


Image
 
View user's profileSend private message
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 10:40 am Reply with quote Back to top

Greg the White wrote:
It's easier to paint some angry, self-affirming sign, and stand outside to fight your moral crusade than to organize free meals for the poor.

I'm not going to disagree with your point, as it is true for many Christians, but in our rush to criticize how hypocritical Christians can be, we should not dismiss the large amount of charity Christians do, especially as NGOs, such as the Catholic Charities organization. There are numerous Christians helping the poor, but the loudmouths obsessed with the issues of homosexuals get all the attention because of how vocal they happen to be.
View user's profileSend private message
Alowishus
Joined: Aug 04 2009
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 01:26 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Cattivo wrote:
Greg the White wrote:
It's easier to paint some angry, self-affirming sign, and stand outside to fight your moral crusade than to organize free meals for the poor.

I'm not going to disagree with your point, as it is true for many Christians, but in our rush to criticize how hypocritical Christians can be, we should not dismiss the large amount of charity Christians do, especially as NGOs, such as the Catholic Charities organization. There are numerous Christians helping the poor, but the loudmouths obsessed with the issues of homosexuals get all the attention because of how vocal they happen to be.

You say Christians helping the poor but do they really do that? Throughout the years i went to church and my time in school where teams were sent out to "help" all they seemed to do it for it their own benefit.

I'm quite a cynical person so it may just be my warped mind thinking this but it's hard to ignore it when my old school takes groups to Malawi (christian groups i will add) to "help people" and in fact they are going for work experience and in helping people all they are actually doing is finding something to stick on their CV.

"Oh look at me i went to poor countries and helped them. Give me a job".

....but sure yes they do help them i can't deny that, they try to improve their lives. Bravo for them. I would never give to Christian charities though? Why? Because i don't support these Christians to be helping them while simulatenously shoving Christianity down their throats.

I donate money to charity to help people NOT to send missionaries over to preach to people. It's absolute bullshit.

I must state as well that all these things i have witnessed. I am not just conjuring up some non-existent argument to "hate on Christians". If they didn't do these things i wouldn't even mention this.
View user's profileSend private message
Drew Linky
Wizard
Joined: Jun 12 2009
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 02:04 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Ok, I get it now. You were confusing me initially.

I've seen this too, where they use every opportunity they get to "help" people, and in the process of doing so they take every chance they can to remind them that it's because of God that these people are getting food to eat, or a shelter.

It's great that you're feeding or providing a home for some people, but don't use that as an excuse to further your own views. That's blatant opportunism and it's aggravating.


https://discord.gg/homestuck is where you can find me literally 99% of the time. Stop on by if you feel like it, we're a nice crowd.
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 02:06 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I can't speak for the generic denominations known as "Christians", but The Church does very little in the way of missionary work and a lot in the way of actual charity.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 02:47 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I had your attitude in high school and college Alo, especially when it came to blood drives where I observed people mainly doing it for image purposes so that they could be viewed as "good" people and get "credit" for that. But, just because a segment of people are doing charity for the purpose of vanity, is no reason to castigate all Christian charity in general - especially as it's a trait that does not solely belong to Christian charity participants (the blood drive cases I cited were school sponsored). You're throwing the baby out with the bath water.

In terms of missionary work, it's better for the less fortunate to get some help while being handed a flyer about Jesus than to get no help at all. And as Syd mentioned, many don't even mention religion while helping others. But, the heavy-handed methods are annoying, though. South Park took some time pokes at that in that Marklar/Starvin Marvin episode a long while back.
View user's profileSend private message
Lady_Satine
Title: Head of Lexian R&D
Joined: Oct 15 2005
Location: Metro area, Georgia
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 03:52 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The Money Song from Avenue Q wrote:
When you help others,
You can’t help helping yourself!
When you help others,
You can’t help helping yourself!
Every time you
Do good deeds
You’re also serving
Your own needs.
When you help others,
You can’t help helping yourself!
When you give
To a worthy cause
You’ll feel as jolly
As Santa Clause.
When you help others,
You can’t
Help
Helping yourself!


"Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time, and you'll have the time of your life!"
 
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Syd Lexia
Site Admin
Title: Pop Culture Junkie
Joined: Jul 30 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
PostPosted: Aug 02 2012 05:31 pm Reply with quote Back to top

That song was sang to solicit month money.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Hacker
Banned
Joined: Sep 13 2008
PostPosted: Aug 03 2012 03:16 am Reply with quote Back to top

Syd Lexia wrote:
I can't speak for the generic denominations known as "Christians", but The Church does very little in the way of missionary work and a lot in the way of actual charity.

The LDS (Mormon) church does quite a bit to help poor with food and as far as missionary work they also do a lot. I'm actually going on a two year mission soon, I just have two interviews left and I'll get my papers telling me where I'm going.

and just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean you need to go out of your way to try and kill it or destroy it. Hate the sin, not the sinner. I've got friends of all sort, druggies, homosexual, straight, christian, catholic, atheist, and everything far and in between. I care what care about those things, I care how they treat me, and how they treat others, and if they share my interests. Like computers, games, and the like.

Even if they legalize homosexual marriage the churches don't need to support it, correct me if I'm wrong but because people want to get married doesn't mean that the churches need to marry them. There's state routes to marry people... at least I think. I really could be wrong here. I'm not the best with law.
View user's profileSend private message
Vaenamoenen
Joined: Mar 18 2010
Location: Tuonela
PostPosted: Aug 03 2012 05:06 am Reply with quote Back to top

The Bible-question comes down to this: is "‘Love your neighbor as yourself" more important than the brief mentions about homosexuality in the Old Testament.

I'm not a Christian by the way so I don't personally care. I define my ethics on secular terms. But I did study theology, among other things.

I do like Jesus's general ethical message (although its impact on our ethics is often exaggerated). What I don't like is the large room for interpretation found in any ancient text corpus, and all the social implications of this. If you know your Bible, you know you can literally defend anything with a suitable interpretation.
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Reply to topic

 
 Jump to: