Author |
Message |
Ghandi
Title: Alexz Aficionado
Joined: May 21 2008
Posts: 2889
|
I searched the forum and didn't find a topic on this film.
Back from a midnight showing. It was pretty amazing
VERY true to the book. It did not feel like 2 hours and 22 minutes. What was cut was definitely made to streamline things and make the story flow faster. I can only imagine how long their first cut was.
It was also shot in my backyard of Charlotte and Asheville areas on North Carolina!  Some friends of mine are in it as extras and even internships.
There was definitely some crying in the theater I was in--by 20+ year old guys trying to hide it  and there are some very touching moments.
Some things to remember.
The movie is Rated PG-13. It's supposed to be a children's book. The book itself is rather descriptive in its violent descriptions and contains nudity of it's heroine, Katniss Everdeen. Needless to say, there is no nudity in this movie and while it is violent, it's not blatant and gory in it's depictions of it. It's based on a violent tradition in the world of the book after all. A ceremonial fight to the death of the rebellions of the Districts against the Capitol.
Anyway, some things were cut for time and streamlining. The violence and nudity I believe were cut for the mass appeal of a PG-13 film. I don't think showing either one would have hurt the film, but it would have changed it into a much more pessimistic dystopian society.
Maybe they'll go Rated R for the next 2. The violence doesn't decrease.
I liked it.
A lot.
Comments?
|
|
|
   |
|
Dr. Jeebus
Moderator
Title: SLF Harbinger of Death
Joined: Sep 03 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
Posts: 5228
|
|
     |
|
i'll_bite_your_ear
Title: Distillatoria
Joined: Jun 09 2010
Location: van down by the river
Posts: 3707
|
Battle Royale was great. Not deep, but very entertaining. Battle Royale 2 was just over the top nonesense though.
|
 it was the best of times
it was the blurst of times |
|
  |
|
aeonic
Title: Sporadic Poster
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 2747
|
Dr. Jeebus wrote: |
I bought the DVD for this movie 12 years ago. It's called Battle Royale. |
To be fair, there's some elements of The Running Man in there too. I don't know, I've heard it's really good from everyone I know who've seen it, but it's probably not something I'd watch in theaters. My friends and sister and female cousins really enjoy the series, and apparently a lot of other people did too, so that's the most I'll poo-poo it; I read part of the first book and while it wasn't my style, I can see how people'd like it. I might even watch when it comes out on DVD, but I also own BR, so I probably won't outright buy it, just rent. I'll try to judge it on it's own merits when I see it, though. I have a feeling that it'll be like the difference between a Fulci zombie film and the remake of Dawn of the Dead, if that makes sense to anyone. If it's getting people out and talking about it and making shitloads of money, more power to it, you know?
|
 Who likes role-playing games? Me. Way too goddamn much. |
|
  |
|
Fighter_McWarrior
Title: Gun of Brixton
Joined: Jun 05 2011
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 1087
|
Dr. Jeebus wrote: |
I bought the DVD for this movie 12 years ago. It's called Battle Royale. |
You, sir, are a winner
|
 "Spanish bombs, yot' quierro y finito
Yo te querda oh ma corazón
Oh ma corazón, oh ma corazón" - The Clash, Spanish Bombs |
|
  |
|
@om*d
Title: Dorakyura
Joined: Jul 10 2010
Location: Castlevania
Posts: 4226
|
I have heard that the movie was okay, but not great. I will wait for it to show up on one of the movie channels.
Also, Battle Royale, fuck yeah!
|
|
|
   |
|
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 3332
|
Yeah, this idea has been done several times over already. I'd rather see the Arnold owning everyone with the pretty Maria Conchita Alonso by his side.
|
|
|
  |
|
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4997
|
So people are bashing this movie because the concept has been done before? I guess you guys haven't watched much of anything for, I don't know, most of your lives.
I'm not saying I like Hunger Games--I haven't seen it or read the books-- but when people crap on it because a part of the story has been seen before, but are then looking forward to something like Batman, it just cracks me up.
|
|
|
   |
|
Cattivo
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 3332
|
The thing is that it doesn't look like it's adding anything worthwhile to it, so why bother seeing it? With the Batman movies, it appeared they were doing them better, so I really wanted to see Batman Begins. Now it looks like the trilogy with be the definitive movie version of the character. Because Nolan & Bale are apparently leaving after the third one, the studio plans to reboot the series again. If the third one is as good as I expect it to be, I will have no need or interest to see any new interpretations of the Batman character, because this current trilogy will have done it so well.
|
|
|
  |
|
justdrop
Title: Supreme Overlord
Joined: Jan 11 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 558
|
I signed up for some Facebook thing that told me I was District 9 before finding out it wasn't a puzzle or game. After that I didn't care. I'll probably catch it on Netflix.
|

"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."- Winston Churchill |
|
   |
|
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4997
|
Cattivo wrote: |
The thing is that it doesn't look like it's adding anything worthwhile to it, so why bother seeing it? |
I'm not saying you should see it. I don't plan on seeing this myself. I was just making a comment on the biggest critique I've heard from everyone (especially from people I know in my real life) about this movie. Stuff like, "Yeah, I read 'The Most Dangerous Game', so no need to see this." Just because it borrows concepts from other stories doesn't mean it's unwatchable. Again, if we followed that logic then we wouldn't watch anything nowadays. Execution of an overused concept (see: Walking Dead) is what can make it worthwhile.
|
|
|
   |
|
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
Posts: 6544
|
Congratulations, grown adult men. You proved to us a series of books and a movie for young adults is too far below you to enjoy. Bravo.
|
|
|
   |
|
Dr. Jeebus
Moderator
Title: SLF Harbinger of Death
Joined: Sep 03 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
Posts: 5228
|
Cattivo wrote: |
Yeah, this idea has been done several times over already. I'd rather see the Arnold owning everyone with the pretty Maria Conchita Alonso by his side. |
And Richard Dawson!
Klimbatize wrote: |
So people are bashing this movie because the concept has been done before? I guess you guys haven't watched much of anything for, I don't know, most of your lives.
I'm not saying I like Hunger Games--I haven't seen it or read the books-- but when people crap on it because a part of the story has been seen before, but are then looking forward to something like Batman, it just cracks me up. |
Yes, everything's been done before. My issue is that everyone is ejaculating over this movie and saying how original it is.
Klimbatize wrote: |
Cattivo wrote: |
The thing is that it doesn't look like it's adding anything worthwhile to it, so why bother seeing it? |
I'm not saying you should see it. I don't plan on seeing this myself. I was just making a comment on the biggest critique I've heard from everyone (especially from people I know in my real life) about this movie. Stuff like, "Yeah, I read 'The Most Dangerous Game', so no need to see this." Just because it borrows concepts from other stories doesn't mean it's unwatchable. Again, if we followed that logic then we wouldn't watch anything nowadays. Execution of an overused concept (see: Walking Dead) is what can make it worthwhile. |
Terrible example. As I understand it the last 2 or 3 episodes of season 2 finally got better, but most of The Walking Dead was a boring, unwatchable pile of shit.
JoshWoodzy wrote: |
Congratulations, grown adult men. You proved to us a series of books and a movie for young adults is too far below you to enjoy. Bravo. |
Up was a movie for kids, not even young adults, and it was by far the best movie I saw the year it came out. Hell, it's one of the best movies I've ever seen.
|
dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com - Updated sometimes, but on hiatus!
UsaSatsui wrote: |
The three greatest heels in history...Andy Kaufman, Triple H, and Dr. Jeebus |
|
|
     |
|
Probable Muppet
Joined: Aug 05 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 867
|
Ah yes, Ghandi was saying that this movie is sort of a mash up of Harry Potter and Logan's Run.
Right?
|
|
|
  |
|
Fighter_McWarrior
Title: Gun of Brixton
Joined: Jun 05 2011
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 1087
|
JoshWoodzy wrote: |
Congratulations, grown adult men. You proved to us a series of books and a movie for young adults is too far below you to enjoy. Bravo. |
Or maybe I just really, really like Battle Royale.
|
 "Spanish bombs, yot' quierro y finito
Yo te querda oh ma corazón
Oh ma corazón, oh ma corazón" - The Clash, Spanish Bombs |
|
  |
|
Klimbatize
2010 NES Champ
Title: 2011 Picnic/Death Champ
Joined: Mar 15 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4997
|
Dr. Jeebus wrote: |
Klimbatize wrote: |
Cattivo wrote: |
The thing is that it doesn't look like it's adding anything worthwhile to it, so why bother seeing it? |
I'm not saying you should see it. I don't plan on seeing this myself. I was just making a comment on the biggest critique I've heard from everyone (especially from people I know in my real life) about this movie. Stuff like, "Yeah, I read 'The Most Dangerous Game', so no need to see this." Just because it borrows concepts from other stories doesn't mean it's unwatchable. Again, if we followed that logic then we wouldn't watch anything nowadays. Execution of an overused concept (see: Walking Dead) is what can make it worthwhile. |
Terrible example. As I understand it the last 2 or 3 episodes of season 2 finally got better, but most of The Walking Dead was a boring, unwatchable pile of shit. |
"As I understand it..."? So you didn't watch the show but are just basing your opinion on what others have said. And that's why Walking Dead is a bad example? LOL, way to form your own opinions.
Fine, but you still get my point. Just sub "Walking Dead" out with some other show/comic/movie/slashfic you actually watched/read/watched/masturbated to and deemed good.
|
|
|
   |
|
JoshWoodzy
Joined: May 22 2008
Location: Goshen, VA
Posts: 6544
|
As far as I can tell, the only similarities between the two are kids killing each other. What else makes it a rip off? I mean, it's not like Battle Royale is even remotely original either.
|
|
|
   |
|
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6108
|
Saw a midnight showing as well. I (FOR ONCE, I'm shocked at myself) haven't read the books, but good god damn did I LOVE the movie. Bought all three books in the series on my Nook as soon as I got home. I agree G, this didn't feel like 2 hours at all, not even at two in the morning. Imho, this movie handles this concept far better than either Running Man or Battle Royal did. I fully plan on seeing this several more times before its out of theatres.
Also: Katniss is an UTTER badass. *District 12 three fingered salute*
|
William Shakespeare wrote: |
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |
|
|
    |
|
Ghandi
Title: Alexz Aficionado
Joined: May 21 2008
Posts: 2889
|
Klimbatize and Soldierhawk seem to the only ones with some sense in this thread. Most haven't bothered to check the source material(something other similar threads get grilled for) or have even researched it very much outside the trailer.
I've read all 3 books.
As book to film adaptations it's one of the best I've ever seen and that's saying a lot.
I could split hairs for details left out of the books, but clearly, few if any here, have bothered to pick them up
|
|
|
   |
|
SoldierHawk
Moderator
Title: Warrior-Poet
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6108
|
OMGOMGOMG please tell me the other two books are as good. I'm worried because I know the main selling point of the first story is the Games--and that can't continue in the next two books. Does Collins manage to stick the landing?
My hope: Katniss becomes a badass rebel leader and overthrows the shit out of Snow. That man needs an arrow in the face, like now.
|
William Shakespeare wrote: |
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none. |
|
|
    |
|
Ghandi
Title: Alexz Aficionado
Joined: May 21 2008
Posts: 2889
|
SoldierHawk wrote: |
OMGOMGOMG please tell me the other two books are as good. I'm worried because I know the main selling point of the first story is the Games--and that can't continue in the next two books. Does Collins manage to stick the landing?
My hope: Katniss becomes a badass rebel leader and overthrows the shit out of Snow. That man needs an arrow in the face, like now. |
Catching Fire will be fine. It's interesting just how they find somewhere else to go and how it's more than a standalone story, which is certainly looks like it must be.
I haven't said it here, but I agree Katniss is a badass! That girl is a survivor. In the books she seems to make stupid choices, to further the plot, which really irritates me, since I know she's smarter than that, but nothing I can do about it.
Katniss is a heroine that is refreshing to see now. I really like her, except for my criticism above.
As for how it all ends. Read the books. I don't want to spoil anything and there's LOTS of twists and turns a long the way. I thought I knew how Catching Fire would end. I was wrong.
If you like her now you should still like her after reading the trilogy.
|
|
|
   |
|
Dr. Jeebus
Moderator
Title: SLF Harbinger of Death
Joined: Sep 03 2005
Location: Wakefield, MA
Posts: 5228
|
Klimbatize wrote: |
Dr. Jeebus wrote: |
Klimbatize wrote: |
Cattivo wrote: |
The thing is that it doesn't look like it's adding anything worthwhile to it, so why bother seeing it? |
I'm not saying you should see it. I don't plan on seeing this myself. I was just making a comment on the biggest critique I've heard from everyone (especially from people I know in my real life) about this movie. Stuff like, "Yeah, I read 'The Most Dangerous Game', so no need to see this." Just because it borrows concepts from other stories doesn't mean it's unwatchable. Again, if we followed that logic then we wouldn't watch anything nowadays. Execution of an overused concept (see: Walking Dead) is what can make it worthwhile. |
Terrible example. As I understand it the last 2 or 3 episodes of season 2 finally got better, but most of The Walking Dead was a boring, unwatchable pile of shit. |
"As I understand it..."? So you didn't watch the show but are just basing your opinion on what others have said. And that's why Walking Dead is a bad example? LOL, way to form your own opinions. |
Nice try, asshole. I watched the entire show except the last 3 episodes. I've been told they got better, but hard to believe.
|
dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com - Updated sometimes, but on hiatus!
UsaSatsui wrote: |
The three greatest heels in history...Andy Kaufman, Triple H, and Dr. Jeebus |
|
|
     |
|
ProtoScott
Title: New Robot Prototype
Joined: Jul 19 2010
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 213
|
I have almost no interest in this movie. I read all the books, and found the first one to be really predictable but still enjoyable, and then I hated the 2nd and 3rd books mostly cause I just wasn't interested in the story they had to tell. I didn't feel like I needed to expand the story beyond the first one.
I really don't like what I have seen in the trailers for the movie. Obviously, the cast is way more hollywood beautiful than I imagined any of the characters in my head, but I expected that to be the case. The setting is what bugged me more in the trailers, it just doesn't look how it looked in my head, and I don't want to paint over all the images I had in my mind.
Having said all that I will be seeing this in theaters anyway cause my girlfriend loves the books and is super excited to see the movie. Hopefully, I will be surprised and at least find it entertaining.
|
 Where's Doctor Wiley... Oh no, too late.
My band's music can be heard here ---->http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/FELD/365363305503
http://useblogswisely.blogspot.com/ <------READ MY WRITINGS HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (or not. I don't care.) |
|
  |
|
Lasher
Title: an horse
Joined: Feb 26 2012
Posts: 169
|
Why is some guy I know saying this will be bigger than Twilight?
|
 get your ass to mars |
|
   |
|
aeonic
Title: Sporadic Poster
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 2747
|
Lasher wrote: |
Why is some guy I know saying this will be bigger than Twilight? |
Because it will be. Film-wise and book-wise, especially if they can figure out a way to stretch the third film into two parts. This, I think, is a good thing. As I'd said earlier, I made it a few chapters into The Hunger Games before I decided I couldn't get into it. I made it about three paragraphs into Twilight. The main character's less Mary Sue, the love interests less Marty Stu. I saw part of the movie online (yes, it's there already), as I've seen part of Twilight on DVD (we had a drinking game going to see how many times Kristen Stewart could give the same facial expression; we did not make it far). Even from the brief comparisons, it's better, and doesn't promote, amongst other things, the idea that stalking a girl and alienating her from friends/family is love and not abuse. The fact that I would rather see Jeebus shoot projectile diarrhea on a stack of commons while fucking Jon Medina through a hole drilled into his skull than have anything else to do with Twilight notwithstanding, Hunger Games is a far better series, at least from what little I've witnessed and from everyone that I know who's talked of either or both of the two seems to indicate.
|
 Who likes role-playing games? Me. Way too goddamn much. |
|
  |
|
|